OPPORTUNITIES COME WHEN CORRUPTION ENDS

Unemployment, Foreclosures, Homelessness. Wall St. has controlled politics for too long. The financial crisis, coupled with Congress' support of big banks' obscene credit card rates are hammering working America. Yet the economy is being put back together to operate in exactly the same way it did when it caused the crisis. Reduce the banks and the Fed down to size, and we might start seeing laws that work for the public. We demand structural changes to the financial sector because megabanks, bailouts, and the revolving door between Wall St. and DC have no place in a system that works in the public's interest.

It's time, join us to restore our economy. Then, go out, talk to friends - change hasn't come from the top.
_____________________________________________________________________


Learn more, join us.





Breaking Up Big Banks, Not in Name Only

"People have said break 'em up. Well, I don't know anybody who can tell me in the abstract how to break 'em up." - Rep. Frank.. Let's tell Congress we know how.


There’s a growing left-right consensus that in order to avoid future risky, volatile markets, we need to make sure megabanks don’t threaten our economy again. Congress says they are working on a solution to "too big to fail." But according to bills proposed as the "Break up the banks" bills, they would expand the government's special treatment for the biggest, riskiest banks and extend the Wall Street bailout indefinitely. Instead, we have laid out what it actually looks like to break up the banks and address the problem of "too big to fail". 

There are a lot of reasons we should break up the biggest mega-banks, and pass laws so they can’t grow so unwieldy and crash the economy along with our jobs again. 

  • -Banks that are so big that the government “has to” step in and bail out are inherently dangerous and can blow up the entire world economy, as we have just seen.
  • -No set of banks should dominate the market and reduce competition.
  • -The financial industry, and especially the Wall Street contingent, are the BIGGEST lobby and wield unparalleled influence in congress and the White House.
  • -Smaller banks are easier to manage, and less likely to take out of control risks.
  • -If banks believe the government is going to bail them out because they are so big they can’t fail without hurting the economy, they will be more likely to take on greater risks.
  • -Bailouts for shareholders and bond holders are an unacceptable use of the public treasury to rescue private risk-takers, functioning as little more than wealth transfers from poor and middle-class taxpayers to wealthy investors and executives.
  • -History demonstrates that governments face tremendous pressure to engage in illegitimate bailouts in the midst of financial crises in part because of the lobbying pressure put on government by big banks.

How to do it?

Why do banks need to be bigger than 100 billion in assets? They don't. Banks should operate responsibly with an interest in keeping our economy intact, rather than get so big they can take down the economy and pass bailout packages in their favor. Therefore, Congress should pass a law making it illegal for a bank to grow over a certain size. These laws follow in the great American traditional distrust of concentrated power, and bring Teddy Roosevelt-style trust-busting to the modern “too big to fail” bank. How to do it?

  • -Pass laws limiting bank size. Give the Department of Justice the authority to break up banks that are over 100 billion in assets.
  • -Pass laws targeting bank size at $100 billion in assets and a target date for compliance. Banks will be responsible for developing a plan to break themselves into components with less than $100 billion in assets by a fixed date, or they pay a fine or must keep higher reserve requirements. If no working plan has been reached after the first 90 day period, fines get larger, and grow again every 90 days until a plan is reached. Banks will have a very powerful incentive to come up with a good plan.
  • -Give the DOJ authority to stop mergers that will make banks grow bigger than 100 billion in assets.
  • -Require that the DOJ start a planning process now for breaking down the biggest banks (15 or so) that are currently over 100 billion in assets.
  • -Pass laws requiring “progressive capitalization” for banks under 100 billion. In other words, the bigger the bank, the more cash it should have on hand. The different levels required should be written into laws so that lobbyists won’t use their power to try to get banks out of requirements.
  • -There are already many size-based laws on the books—the FDIC limits what percentage of the countries’ deposits can be held by any bank after a merger, and antitrust law gives the DOJ the power to break up monopolies. We support new, straightforward size-based laws for banks, with enforcement power given to the DOJ, which is less likely to get coopted by pressure from the industry.

Send Congress a message: We have the solution to "too big to fail" and they need to enact them.


embed code


Tell Congress

New laws should be put in place that minimize the risk of companies becoming “too big to fail.”


Get involved

Read the blog

Don't see your city? Start your group

Have an event in your city

Tell your friends to sign up.

Join the FaceBook Fan page

Follow on Twitter @wayfwd - hashtag #anwf




My Groups

Not a member of any groups.

MyInvitations (created)

News and Analysis

Sick of banks' corrupting powers? Sick of banks getting richer while our country feels a little dumpy? Senator Sanders is sponsoring a real Break Up the Banks bill. We recently put up a statement on the...

Left for dead after November 2008, the Republicans look pretty good for a bunch of zombies. The neo-cons plan to destabilize the Middle East and southwest Asia seems fully entrenched. In fact since the Democrats' triumph last November, we can't...

It's interesting: Congress is trying to put one over us and for a second we were excited to be wooed by them (I was glad to see them using language like "break up the banks" and "end too-big-to-fail"). They put out a bill called the Too-big-to-...

READ MORE


BOOKS

1)Lawrence Goodwyn’s “The Populist Moment: A Short History of the Agrarian Revolt in America,” one of the truly great works of American history and how to build a foundation for 20th century American political economy.

2)William Greider’s “Secrets of the Temple: How the Federal Reserve Runs the Country,” picks up where Goodwyn’s left off. An essential read in understanding money, banking and finance in the 20th century.

3)Kevin Phillips’ “Bad
Money: Reckless Finance, Failed Politics, and the Global Crisis of
American Capitalism
,”


MELTDOWN CAUSES: Articles and Interviews

1. Finger of blame points to shadow banking’s implosion -Financial Times
2. Musings on Structural Challenges to the Financial System -Yves Smith
3. Hedge fund Manager Goodbye -Andrew Lahde
4. The End -Michael Lewis
5. Alan Greenspan and the Fed -William Greider
6. Bill Moyers and Kevin Phillips -video
7. Destructive Rise of Big Finance -Kevin Phillips
8. The Quiet Coup -Simon Johnson


"FINANCIAL INNOVATIONS"

1. Genesis of the Debt Disaster -Financial Times
2. Reforming Credit Default Swaps -Institutional Risk Analyst
3. AIG Bailout -Yves Smith
4. Mark to Model -Yves Smith


WHAT TO DO ABOUT THE BIG BANKS THAT FAIL?

1. Willem Buiter -FT
2. Thomas Hoening -Kansas City Federal Reserve
3. Joseph Stiglitz -Nobel Laureate
4. Nassim Taleb -FT
5. Dan Tarullo -Federal Reserve


ANTITRUST

1. Breaking up the Banks -Zephyr Teachout
2. Too Big to Fail is Too Big -Willem Buiter
3. Vigourous Antitrust -Christine Varney, Asst Atty General of DOJ, AT


REGULATION

1. Regulatory Capture -Thomas Frank
2. Making Regulation Work -Zephyr Taachout, Shawn Bayern


WHAT'S IT MEAN FOR THE ECONOMY?

1. Evolution or Revolution -Bill Gross
2. The Future of the American Dream -William Greider
3. Tom Geoghegan and William Greider on the Economy - audio
4. Andrew Bacevich Interview With Bill Moyers - video


Blogs

Naked Capitalism
Calculated Risk
The Baseline Scenario

JOIN US:


email
follow
Feed
fan

Sign In to Start Posting

Upcoming Events

10/15/2009 - 14:30

10/25/2009 - 03:00

10/25/2009 - 09:00

11/04/2009 - 19:30

ANWF Actions

New York City, April 11April 11

LATEST NEWS STORY FROM ANWF



Greenspan Says U.S. Should Consider Breaking Up Large Banks

By Michael McKee and Scott Lanman

Oct. 15 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. regulators should consider breaking up large financial institutions considered “too big to fail,” former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said.

Those banks have an implicit subsidy allowing them to borrow at lower cost because lenders believe the government will always step in to guarantee their obligations. That squeezes out competition and creates a danger to the financial system, Greenspan told the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.

“If they’re too big to fail, they’re too big,” Greenspan said today. “In 1911 we broke up Standard Oil -- so what happened? The individual parts became more valuable than the whole. Maybe that’s what we need to do.”

At one point, no bank was considered too big to fail, Greenspan said. That changed after the Treasury Department under then-Secretary Hank Paulson effectively nationalized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the Treasury and Fed bailed out Bear Stearns Cos. and American International Group Inc.

“It’s going to be very difficult to repair their credibility on that because when push came to shove, they didn’t stand up,” Greenspan said.

Fed officials have suggested imposing a tax or requiring higher capital ratios on larger banks to ensure the firms’ safety and reduce some of the competitive advantage from the implied subsidy. Greenspan said that won’t work.

“I don’t think merely raising the fees or capital on large institutions or taxing them is enough,” Greenspan said. “I think they’ll absorb that, they’ll work with that, and it’s totally inefficient and they’ll still be using the savings.”

‘Really Arbitrarily’

The former Fed chairman said while “just really arbitrarily breaking down organizations into various different sizes” goes against his philosophical leanings, something must be done to solve the too-big-to-fail issue.

“If you don’t neutralize that, you’re going to get a moribund group of obsolescent institutions which will be a big drain on the savings of the society,” he said.

“Failure is an integral part, a necessary part of a market system,” he said. “If you start focusing on those who should be shrinking, it undermines growing standards of living and can even bring them down.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Michael McKee in New York at mmckee@bloomberg.net; Scott Lanman in Washington at slanman@bloomberg.net